How four architects set the agenda for late 20th-century modernism on a quiet creek in Cornwall – and what one of them did next

To celebrate the recent release of Issue No.3 of The Modern House Magazine, we’re sharing a story from our series that celebrates the very best and most influential examples of British modernism, The Classics.

For issue No.3, our Editor, Charlie Monaghan, and Lead Photographer, Elliot Sheppard, discovered how four ambitious young architects came together in the early-mid 1960s to design a house on a sleepy Cornish creek – setting their intention for redefining modernism in the latter half of the 20th century. Two members of the group would become some of the biggest names in architecture to this day, while one would build another house on the same creek that embodied their high-tech vision. To see this story and many more in print, pick up your set of issue No.2 and No.3 today. 

Charlie: If you had big ambitions in architecture in the early 1960s, Yale University’s department of architecture was a good place to be. The faculty was chaired at the time by Paul Rudolph, a leading American modernist who had been taught by Bauhaus founder Walter Gropius at Harvard. On the Yale campus were buildings by Eero Saarinen and Louis Kahn, the latter having joined the faculty in 1947 – a time in which his colleagues would’ve included Josef Albers and Philip Johnson, still making appearances at Yale in the 1960s. A new library by Gordon Bunshaft of Skidmore, Owings & Merrill was about to start construction. Serge Chermayeff and Vincent Scully were professors. The best architects in the world were teaching in buildings that represented the most experimental architecture of the time. In 1962, a group of Brits were just about to graduate. Their names were Norman Foster and Su and Richard Rogers.

They had arrived in 1961 from an austere postwar Britain that hadn’t embraced modernism in the way the United States, fuelled by economic prosperity, was doing with unfretted fervour. Richard had arrived in the US by sea, on the Queen Elizabeth. “It had towered over Southampton,” he later recalled. “In New York, it was dwarfed by the buildings.” America was big, bold and modern – a glamorous, energised contrast to war-scarred Europe.
The trio were in their element, inspired and invigorated by the US architectural scene.

Penniless but eager, they relentlessly toured works by Frank Lloyd Wright, blagging or sneaking their way into buildings such as Fallingwater. They went to see Kahn talk in Philadelphia, forged close relationships with Chermayeff and Johnson, and drank martinis with James Stirling at Mies van der Rohe’s Seagram Building in New York. It was the experience of being immersed in architecture, as much as their education, that was formative for the ambitious trio.

Upon their return to the UK in 1963, Norman, Su and Richard joined up with Wendy Cheesman – soon to become Wendy Foster – to form Team 4, a name picked for its implications of collaboration and collectivism. Their first pitch for work was to Su’s father, Marcus Brumwell, an ad man who wanted a retirement home on a piece of land he owned on a creek in Feock, Cornwall, for him and his wife, Rene. Original plans for a house by Ernst Freud, son of Sigmund, had been sent to Richard while he was at Yale – he called them “appalling” and thought the couple should have a home worthy of displaying the art they had spent years collecting from then early-career artists such as Henry Moore, Barbara Hepworth and Ben Nicholson. Needless to say, Team 4 came to the rescue.

The resulting house, Creek Vean, is comprised of two flat-roofed volumes. One is a two-storey structure containing a living room suspended over an open-plan kitchen, both with arresting views to the south of the Fal Estuary via expanses of frameless glass.The other is a more stealthy single-storey block with bedrooms overlooking the creek and a valley-facing guest suite, all accessed off a long, top-lit, gallery-like hallway for displaying the Brumwell’s art. Entrance to the house from the road is a via a bridge that leads to the front door, then beyond to a series of steep steps that descends the sloping site to garden level, and which divides the two wings of the house.

“It was Norman and Richard’s first building and it had to be a good one,” Su has said. “They knew that it had to be right.” Standing in Creek Vean today, 55 years after it was completed, there is a sense of it being a sort of ground zero for the careers of architects who have made some of the most recognisable additions to city skylines around the world over the past six decades. Encased in the design are fragments from their time in the US, and the work of old guard modernists. There’s the influence of Wright, specifically the way the design makes use of the site’s position on a steep slope above water. Look at the stairs at Alvar Aalto’s Säynätsalo Town Hall and you’ll be in no doubt where the idea for the ones at Creek Vean came from. Rudolph, their tutor at Yale, would have approved of the way they chose to sink the building into the site.

But equally embedded into Creek Vean are the architectural signatures that would come to define their work. Richard’s home in Chelsea, for which he gutted and combined two Georgian townhouses in the mid-1980s, especially comes to mind: living space is similarly suspended above an open-plan kitchen, creating connected but separated spaces, and the steel kitchen island is a like-for-like of the one at Creek Vean. While the house’s materiality – concrete blocks and slate flooring – make it seem much more grounded and brutalist than the lightweight feel the group would strive for later on, there is an emphasis on flexible, open space. The precision and order of Norman and Wendy’s work (which they did under the name Foster Associates until Wendy’s death in 1989) is prefigured in the ultra-efficient plan and razor-sharp details. But perhaps above all, in the pure sculpture of the place, with its all its angular beauty, the spectacle and drama that has been a consistent component of their work ever since is acutely felt. If Team 4’s buildings do nothing else, they make a strong first impression.

Read the architectural literature on Creek Vean, and it’s easy to get the impression that Team 4 was actually Team 2. Richard and Norman’s careers weigh heavy on how the house has been canonised, due in part perhaps to Wendy’s death and Su and Richard’s divorce in the early 1970s. But stand facing the creek from certain points in the garden or on the entrance bridge and, between the dense trees, you will catch sight of another structure that is a reminder Creek Vean wasn’t the beginning of two careers, but four.

Pillwood House, designed in 1972 and completed in 1974, shares much the same back story to Creek Vean. It was commissioned by Su’s father again and, just as the first house had been financed through the sale of a Piet Mondrian canvas, was paid for by art – this time a relief work by Ben Nicholson. Fewer than 10 years had passed since Creek Vean’s much-fraught construction was completed in 1966 but a lot had changed. Team 4 disbanded in 1967, shortly after their most celebrated and auspicious project, the Reliance Controls Factory, was completed. Norman and Wendy were busy working on projects that would launch the Foster name. Just before they separated, Su and Richard won the Pompidou Centre design competition with Renzo Piano. The group of cash-strapped students who gawked at Wright buildings were now out in the world, designing projects that would give modernism its high-tech, industrial expression in the closing decades of the 20th century.

Su’s design for the new house was one such early expression, completed with her then partner and soon-to-be husband, John Miller. The two-storey house has bedrooms on the lower level, split up by sliding screens, with open-plan kitchen and living space positioned above, where there are 180-degree views. There are two spiral staircases connecting the levels: one at the back of the house, cocooned in a cylindrical fibreglass case, and the other ascending the slope-roofed conservatory section of the house.

As with later high-tech projects, the conventional model for what a building should look like was abandoned and cutting-edge technology was embraced – it was the first residential project in the country to use fibreglass. But while it looks nothing like a house found anywhere else, never mind in architecturally conservative Cornwall, Pillwood sits easy within the forest, due in part to the painted green of the steel frame, but also because there is a lightness and transparency to its design. Like a greenhouse, it gives the impression of opening itself up to the light, rather than closing off. Su’s son, Ab Rogers, described the house as “naked” when he chose it as one of his top three favourite living spaces on The Modern House podcast, adding, “Its magic is about how few elements it consists of.”

Visiting Creek Vean first, as I did, where current owners Dick and Gill Dickinson were at home – wonderful custodians who have worked tirelessly to restore the house – and Pillwood afterwards, where Ab and his family were in residence on their annual summer holiday, there is a feeling of the two houses being successive chapters of the same book; as though the creek’s gentle valley were an open spread about the life and work of Team 4. Where Creek Vean tells a triumphant story of the ambitions of four young architects, who, fuelled by the energising spirit of mid-century American modernism, designed one of the best houses of its generation, Pillwood, despite being the work of only one Team 4 member, tells of how their greater ambitions would be realised – how they used the lessons of 20th- century architecture they learned in America and applied them with new materials and building technology, ultimately leaving their mark on the annals of architectural history. All that, in a sleepy, bucolic Cornish creek.

Related stories